MONDO ARC

Paul James

Editorial comment February 2009


So it looks like the proverbial really is hitting the fan. No sooner had my last editorial piece warned that manufacturers needed to adapt to survive the credit crunch, news filtered through that Fitzgerald had gone bump and then the economic climate turned even chillier than first thought post-Christmas.

Whilst news of Fitzgerald’s demise would not have surprised many in the industry, the parallels with the retail industry are there for all to see. Well known traditional brands in the UK like Woolworths, MFI, Land Of Leather and Wedgwood have all bitten the dust much to the chagrin of the Great British Public, but come on, did YOU ever shop there? These companies failed to adjust to new market conditions and have paid the price.

On the other side of the coin, some companies are trying to change, maybe to hard. Recently, a TV programme charted the progress of that British bastion of roadside cafes, Little Chef (again, despite the wistful nostalgia, WHO actually ate there?), after they drafted in the services of Big Chef Heston Blumenthal. The initial problems with the menu brought a wry smile to this editor - too expensive, too confusing, too... unnecessary. Ring any bells?

I speak of course of the LED specification industry and the raft of lighting manufacturers who are currently flooding the market with LED fixtures. I know I keep banging on about this but I’m not alone. Virtually every lighting designer I speak to is becoming increasingly frustrated with the lack of ‘apples with apples’ analysis on the myriad of datasheets they get presented with by over eager reps in search of their next big sale. This is doing the industry no favours.

Two contributors to this edition of mondo*arc raise the same concerns. Firstly, Dr Geoff Archenhold calls for all LED luminaire manufacturers to plainly spell out operational figures on their datasheets allowing the industry to maintain a workable, professional standard. As an insight into what could happen with UK Government strategy in the future (after all he is a government adviser), Archenhold suggests a US Caliper-style programme that compares actual performance against datasheet stated figures.

Secondly, Jon Estell of Insta UK, itself a seller of LED products, has submitted a letter berating the lack of a class rating system for the quality of the electronics within LED fixtures in the UK. With some LED projects with a promised 50,000 hour lifetime now prematurely beginning to fail, Estell is worried that all LED fixture manufacturers will be tarred with the same brush. With differing requirements for different projects, a rating system would help the specifier choose the right product for the job.


We fully support both opinions and are sure that Dr. Geoff will continue to bang the drum in his column in this magazine. Transparent data for competitively priced LED products is surely the way forward. We need to know exactly what we are getting within the layers involved in the manufacture of an LED fixture. Just like Little Chef’s famous Olympic Breakfast. You know where you are with an Olympic Breakfast, eh? But even perceived perfection, no matter how believable, can be improved upon. The LED industry must try harder.

 

Users Comments

Re: mondo*arc blogs
Posted By eobaldt 1 February 16, 2009 08:28:14 AM

Dear all, very well, this article is just pointing towards a very sensitive point within the entire LED lighting industry. Who honestly can deal with the vast amount of products, who can tell good for bad and evaluate what is really worthy to use? I think that the sheer countless number of LED applications makes it very hard for architects and designers, choosing the best product for the best value. Life terms are mostly related to the specifications of the LED manufacturer, but what about the other components in use? Would you buy a car when you know that only the engine will be lasting for a long period of time but maybe your gearbox needs a change once a while but nobody mentioned this before? I am seeing this problem for many years. In order to help the creative people making the right choice, I even opened the maybe first LED consultancy office in Germany. Since I am part of this industry for about 10 years now, there is a huge knowledge base which I offer to architects and designers, helping them to find the needle in the hay and giving them the tools they really need to accomplish their targets. Any good LED luminaire is far more complex than people realize and just pointing to the life time, promised by the LED manufacturer, is simply too easy, when it comes to architectural lighting. Some years ago, when many companies wanted to join in order to fight against the CK patents, I already tried to find companies which would like to team up, create an association which would set up industry standards, handle patent issues and giving talented people the chance to develop new and innovative technologies which would drive the industry further. Maybe I was too early, most likely I was. Your article indicates that the time might be right now. Let’s try it again? In this spirit – keep on banging on this – you have my full sympathy and support. Best regards Detlef Eobaldt

Re: Paul James
Posted By kinquo 1 June 29, 2010 12:27:54 AM

EslTge zydwqcuxjzxy , [url=http://dlopwkjyjhbi.com/]dlopwkjyjhbi[/url], [link=http://iobbmiepikwa.com/]iobbmiepikwa[/link], http://agykhvqeigxj.com/

Re: Paul James
Posted By kinquo 1 June 29, 2010 07:18:21 AM

lRkcJz ufnaskqbsulr , [url=http://xtnrvljpfwnx.com/]xtnrvljpfwnx[/url], [link=http://gjjtgrsohzug.com/]gjjtgrsohzug[/link], http://yqfjjztfmylu.com/
Post a Comment
 
Editor: Paul James Editor: Paul James

SEARCH





Arc Show euroLed IALD Luminale OLED Insider SBID